@article{AOJ4880,
author = {Gian Andrea Lucidi and Alberto Grassi and Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina and Luca Macchiarola and Stefano Zaffagnini},
title = {Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction vs . non-anatomic ACL reconstruction with lateral tenodesis},
journal = {Annals of Joint},
volume = {3},
number = {0},
year = {2018},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most common knee surgical procedure. The overall outcome of the ACL-reconstruction is very satisfactory, however, some patients continue to experience dynamic instability and therefore reduced clinical outcome and lower return to sports rate even after a technically correct surgery. Different approaches have been proposed to address the rotatory instability: an anatomical ACL reconstruction or an intra-articular ACL reconstruction with an extra-articular augmentation or tenodesis (EAT). This review is focused on the historical and contemporary rationale of the combined procedure (EAT).},
issn = {2415-6809}, url = {https://aoj.amegroups.org/article/view/4880}
}